TEUTONICISM

Webster's Encyclopedic Unabridged Dictionary of the English Language (1989)

Teutonicism: 1. the character or spirit of the Teutons, esp. the Germans. 2. a Teutonic characteristic. 3. a Germanism.

**********

KPS REPORTS

Although others will certainly find much of interest, this journal is primarily aimed at German-Americans, who are proud of their German ancestry, and who hold the German people in high regard for having created the most advanced and civilized nation on earth.

This journal addresses the anger and resentment such German-Americans harbor, or certainly should harbor, over the lies of the "victor's propaganda," from the two World Wars, which have demonized, and today continue to demonize, people of German ancestry and the German nation their forefathers created.

**********

GERMANS ARE THE
SMARTEST PEOPLE
ON EARTH

For a long time I have believed that the Germans are the smartest people on earth, but I didn't have the proof to satisfy me. Now I do.

Below, I will add some quotes from two different articles:

1.Times of London - Germans are Brainiest (But, at Least We’re Smarter Than the French) (The first quote, below, only)

2. Professor J. Philippe Rushton - Winters Are Good For Your Genes: Lynn Book Finds World Average IQ 90, Declining From North To South (All the rest of the below quotes)

A recent "European League" ranking of the national IQs of European nations is contained in the Times article.

Rushton's article contains information of world-wide national IQs.

The areas inside the quotation marks are the quotes.

"Top of the table were the Germans, with an IQ of 107."

But, one wonders how much the large percentage of Turks, who are German citizens, drops this average German IQ. The table notes that the IQ of Turkey is 90.

It should also be noted that a number for the English is not included in the table. Instead, the number of 100 is noted for the "British Isles," which includes far more than just the English people.

"... the world average IQ is no more than 90 ..."

"Both showed that the East Asians obtained higher averages than White Europeans in the United States and Britain."

"He concludes that the East Asians—Chinese, Japanese and Koreans—have the highest mean IQ at 105. Europeans follow with an IQ of 100."

"South East Asians (IQ 87),"

"The lowest scoring are the Bushmen of the Kalahari Desert together with the Pygmies of the Congo rain forests (IQ 54)."

But, what about the supposed high IQ of the Jews?

"Another anomaly: the average IQ of Israel is only about 95—substantially higher than the median IQ of 85 found elsewhere in the region, but much lower than the average IQ of Jews outside of Israel, estimated at between 108 and 115.

"Lynn breaks the Israeli IQ into three components: 40 percent Ashkenazim (European Jewish) with a mean IQ of 103; 40 percent Sephardim (Oriental Jewish) with a mean IQ of 91; and 20 percent Arab with a mean IQ of 86, which is virtually the same as that of Arabs elsewhere. Lynn suggests these differences could have arisen from selective migration (more intelligent Jews emigrated to Britain and the USA),"

What is actually being said is that the European Jews in Israel have an IQ of 103, while European Jews living in America and Britain have an average IQ higher ... say 108. And, one wonders about his use of the word "estimated," when referring to the IQ of Jews outside of Israel.

But, he adds that it is just a matter of grouping. In other words, it is taking the smartest of a group and dividing them away into a separate group, and then measuring their IQ, which will be very high, because only the high ones have been selected for the test.

If you take what is probably the real European Jew IQ which is 103, and the East Asian IQ which is 105, and then compare them to the German IQ which is 107, you will come to the conclusion that the Germans are the smartest people on earth ... and I accept this as the proof of what I have long suspected and believed.

No. 0287 (03/31/06)

 

********

CHARLEY REESE
on the two American wars against Germany.

********

Charley Reese, The Greatest Civic Sin (10/14/02):

That's why I've become so anti-war, which is not the same thing as being a pacifist. I will support any war in the genuine defense of this country, but I have not seen an honest war in my lifetime or read of one since the War Between the States. Even World War II was based on lies. It's true that the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor. It is also true that the Roosevelt administration maneuvered them into a position in which they had no choice but to attack the United States. The Japanese certainly did not wish to go to war with the United States if it could have been avoided. Even the Third Reich never had any interest in conquering the world as Americans were told repeatedly during the war.

Both the "War to End All Wars" and the "War for Democracy" were based on lies. They were both wars involving a conflict of empires and would-be empires, which did not concern the United States. Peace and democracy had nothing to do with the wars.

********

AND ...

********

Even though, as Charley Reese noted in the quote just above, both of the World Wars were based on lies, we are still not supposed to talk about it. We are still supposed to accept, without question, the victors' anti-German propaganda.

An example of this attitude is contained in a New York Times (02/26/09) article called Facing German Suffering, and Not Looking Away.

The article states:

“It all hangs on this notion of universal guilt, that Hitler’s atrocities were so great that nothing could be said in defense of the Germans,” said Giles MacDonogh, a British historian and author of the 2007 book “After the Reich,” which detailed the suffering of the German population during the postwar occupation by the allies. “There is still this definite feeling that it is not intellectually respectable, not socially respectable to dwell on these matters.”

But, as George Orwell stated: "If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear."

********

THEREFORE ...
 

********

THE WORST MISTAKE
OF THE
TWENTIETH CENTURY

Certainly, the 20^th century was full of disastrous and monstrous mistakes. With little effort, a seemingly endless list could be created. But, there was one that is contributing greatly to the end of Western Civilization. And, for me, personally, it brings almost more bitterness than I can bear.

America’s largest ethnic group is the German-American. Generally, a figure of about 25 percent of the population is stated as being of German descent.

The German-American group has long outnumbered the group that is of English ancestry. But, that has not changed the basic "power structure" of America, which has always been in the hands of the English-Americans (that is the minor portion that the so-called Jews don’t control).

The English-Americans have repeatedly used this control of the American power structure to promote the use of American might to back interests of England. This was certainly the case in both WWI and WWII.

It has been an ongoing problem for German-Americans that it has not traditionally been an interest of Germans to be involved in political affairs, especially in America. Many German-Americans like to think that this allows the group to pursue more worthwhile activities, such as farming. It has unfortunately been a very costly mistake for not only German-Americans, but for Germany, itself.

The worst mistake of the 20th century was that German-Americans did not actively revolt against the English power-elements of America in 1917, when President Wilson led the American nation into the unjust war against Germany.

At that time, the German-American people had the numbers and know-how to literally tear this nation to shreds, rather than allow it to go to war against the German people and nation. And, that is precisely what the German-Americans should have done. They should have brought this nation to its knees, before they would allow it to go to war against their kin in Europe.

But, as Adolf Hitler noted in his 1924 book Mein Kampf, Volume One, Chapter III, "Political Reflections Arising Out Of My Sojourn In Vienna":

The education which makes them the devotees of such abstract notions as ‘Democracy’, ‘International Socialism’, ‘Pacifism’, etc., is so hard-and-fast and exclusive and, operating as it does from within outwards, is so purely subjective that in forming their general picture of outside life as a whole they are fundamentally influenced by these a priori notions. But, on the other hand, the attitude towards their own German nationality has been very objective from youth upwards. The Pacifist – in so far as he is a German – who surrenders himself subjectively, body and soul, to the dictates of his dogmatic principles, will always first consider the objective right or wrong of a situation when danger threatens his own people, even though that danger be grave and unjustly wrought from outside. But he will never take his stand in the ranks of his own people and fight for and with them from the sheer instinct of self-preservation.

And, Hitler added in Volume Two, Chapter II, "The State":

Through it the Germans lack that strong herd instinct which arises from unity of blood and saves nations from ruin in dangerous and critical times; because on such occasions small differences disappear, so that a united herd faces the enemy.

On June 4, 2006, an article was published, on the Internet, called Ron Guhname Compares Ethnic Groups. It states:

In America, which ethnic group is most ethnocentric? The General Social Survey asked respondents if they think about social and political issues as Americans or as members of an ethnic group. The obvious choice is blacks, right? Well yeah, there's no news there. Listed below are the percent who answered ethnic group:

1. Blacks 43.5%
2. Mexicans 21.9
3. Jews 15.8
4. Italians 12.0
5. American Indians 7.8
6. Irish 5.1
7. Scots 4.8
8. English/Welsh 2.5
9. Germans .9

So, we can see that Hitler, evidently, understood quite well the horrendous WWI betrayal, of which German-Americans were guilty. And, perhaps, he even foresaw the possibility that German-Americans would repeat this same betrayal again in WWII.

It was the German effort in WWII that most certainly was the White Race/Western Civilization’s last chance for a tribalist, and nationalist, victory over the Internationalist-Socialist forces that were the power behind the Allies. And, it was the defeat of that German effort that almost guarantees the extinction of the White peoples of Northern-Europe and the end of their civilization.

For me, the bitterness and resentment grows daily over the German-American betrayal of their kin in Europe, as I watch the American nation fall further into the results of that German loss, the multicultural/multiracial cesspool that is America today. That bitterness even flows onto my own German-American father, who flew American B-24s and B-17s in WWII. And, it also is directed at well-known Americans, such as Charles Lindbergh, who, I believe, knew that America was on the wrong side of the war, but, who could not bring himself to actually join the German side and, instead, ended up helping America fight in the Pacific.

Again, the betrayal by America's Germans, of their kin in Europe, will, someday, be understood to be a major cause of the extinction of Western Civilization and the race of White Northern-Europeans.

No. 0274 (09/22/02)

********

1. Peter Brimelow Immigration, Innumeracy, And The Case For Impeaching Judges

Now this is something which, as I say, is really strange. The only explanation that I can offer in a nutshell is what I call in Alien Nation, “Hitler’s Revenge”. I think the effects of fighting the Second World War, on the Anglosphere culture, turned the elites so strongly against racism and xenophobia and that kind of thing, that they kind of went overboard the other way. They became incapable of dealing with any questions dealing with race, ethnicity or nationality.

Like the famous bird of RAF origin that flies around in ever diminishing circles until it finally vanishes in a way which I won’t go into, they got over on the other side and as a result their leading their nation-states to destruction.

2. Forward Wagner’s ‘Ring’ Strikes a Jarring but Muted Chord in L.A.

Nicholas Vazsonyi, an associate professor of German and comparative literature at the University of South Carolina and author of the forthcoming book “Richard Wagner: Self-Promotion and the Making of a Brand,” said that scholars are deeply divided on the question of whether Wagner’s antisemitism is evident in his musical works. “There is no such thing as antisemitic music,” he said. “But it is true that Wagner was very much committed to the project of developing a German musical idiom and presenting himself as the most German composer ever. To that extent, if one says that pro-German equals antisemitic, you could make an argument that his music is antisemitic.”

3. Tom Sunic White Identity in Postmodernity

The Jewish Holocaust has become a critical component of identity for the Western world in need of new quasi-religious symbolism — the culture of the Holocaust. In 2005, the President of the Federal Republic of Germany, Horst Köhler, tearfully declared in the Israeli Knesset that the responsibility for Shoah is part of German identity.” ("Die Verantwortung für die Schoa ist Teil der deutschen Identität.) Similarly, the former Chancellor of Germany Gerhard Schröder declared that “the remembrance of the Shoah belongs to our identity.”

Think about that. If taken literally, it would mean that one could not think of oneself as a German without also thinking about the role of Germans in the Holocaust. To be a German is to have the mark of Cain branded on one's forehead.

This culture of the Holocaust is staunchly maintained by the judicial system in Europe. The perception of either real or surreal anti-Semitic identity triggers judicial wrath. Any academic who questions the modern Jewish narrative can easily land into the claws of the Criminal Code — the dreaded German StGB, Section 130, or the French “Loi Fabius- Gayssot.”

4. John Keegan, “The First World War” (1998)

Page 202: The survivors were a bare majority of those who had come forward. Of the 15,000 infantry of the 21^st and 24^th Divisions, over 8,000 had been killed or wounded. Their German enemies, nauseated by the spectacle of the “corpse field of Loos,” held their fire as the British turned in retreat, “so great was the feeling of compassion and mercy after such a victory.”

Page 296: If the Germans had been shaken, it was by the “amazing spectacle of unexampled gallantry courage and bulldog determination” and by their eventual revulsion from the slaughter inflicted; in many places when they realized their own lives were no longer at risk, they ceased firing, so that the more lightly British wounded could make their way back as best they could to their own front line.

Page 399: British machine-gunners in another post were luckier. “I thought we had stopped them,” remembered Private J. Parkinson,

When I felt a bump in the back, I turned around and there was a German officer with a revolver in my back. “Come along, Tommy. You’ve done enough.” I turned round then and said “Thank you very much, Sir.” I know what I would have done if I had been held up by a machine gunner and had that revolver in my hand, I’d have finished him off. He must have been a real gentleman.

5. Paul Gottfried Neocons on the Danube

It is now destined to be taught by the residents of Obamaland how to create the proper form of democratic government, together with a “civil society” that corresponds to the values of the re-educators. Apparently this project worked so well with the Krauts and imbued them with such inexpressible loathing for their national identity that the same project is to be tried again for the benefit of Eastern Europeans. ...

We’re also given ample heaps of Fritz Stern railing against the German Sonderweg and tortuous warnings from Habermas about the collective German past. ...

There are further problems with Tismameanu’s tendentious picture. Even if I accepted his analysis of a innately Nazi Germans, supplied by Stern-Habermas, why should that cause me to believe that everyone’s national identity is as intrinsically evil as that of the Germans? ...

Moreover, nations that do not feel they are part of a national community are very much subject to those nations that do. Thus the Teutonophobe, nationalist Polish government has explicitly forbidden the German Chancellor to set up a center in Berlin that calls attention to Poland’s crimes against German minorities from 1945 onward. Although these crimes resulted in millions of deaths and expulsions, Germans are forbidden—and have forbidden themselves—to express what the German press and the Polish government consider “revanchist” sentiments. Meanwhile the Polish government imposes new demands on the Germans to pay further reparations for Polish laborers brought to Germany during World War Two. When the two countries discuss ticklish controversies at joint conferences or in joint publications, the Germans obligingly provide the account of past events favored by Polish nationalists. ...

Anyhow the Germans have taken the necessary steps to becoming post-national and may soon cease to exist as an ethnic nation. For example, Germans no longer reproduce their evil seed, although Habermas hopes that his people will stay around long enough to make an impression as inconsolable penitents before the rest of the world. Furthermore, the Germans are happily allowing their government to hand them over to an EU super-state, even without a popular vote. And then there’s the ultimate act of German national suicide, which consists of handing over inner cities to mostly uneducated and often fanatically Muslim immigrants. One can thereby eliminate German fascism and illiberal German nationalism both at the same time by getting rid of the people in question.

6. Tom Sunic The EU Rip-Off

The founding myths of the European Union are the credo of the free market coupled with the civic religion of multiculturalism and antifascism. The chief architect of this ideology of “Europeism” was the late Jean Monnet, a French-British agent and a big-time arms peddler, who helped secure the Allied invasion in Normandy in 1944. The dominant idea behind the creation of the European Union was to keep Germany harnessed while tapping into its Prussian work ethic and financial largesse. One-third of the EU budget tab is footed by German taxpayers. Seen from perspective of international law, Germany is still at war with the Allies. It is certainly no accident that, unlike any other member state in the European Union, including the other big two — the UK and France — Germany has no privilege of holding a referendum when rejecting or endorsing EU treaties. Germany has no choice but to accept the decisions of the European Commission, with the obligatory nodding of its nondescript parliament, the Bundestag.